Which Tri-Five Chevy is your favorite? It powerfulness say a lot most your personality.
One of the most meaning cars to come upward out of the 1950s were the so-called tri-five Chevys - the 1955 through 1957 models which are withal cherished today every bit collector's items. Oddly plenty , they weren't the best selling cars of the era , ofttimes beingness outsold yesteryear the to a greater extent than dowdy-looking Ford Fairlane.
What made these cars thence significant? This was General Motors' outset endeavor at an cheap overhead valve V-8 engine powered auto that was relatively lightweight as well as nimble for its time. The 1950 through 54 Chevrolet were large as well as heavy as well as under-powered. The term "Heavy Chevy" arguably could hold upward said to emanate from this era.
The 1953 Chevy was bloated as well as deadening , offering only i engine alternative , an inline six.
The 1950 through 1954 Chevrolets were bloated affairs powered yesteryear the famous Blue Flame 6. No V8 alternative was offered. Meanwhile , Ford was having brisk sales of its aging flathead V8 as well as developing a novel overhead valve V-8. For 1955 , General Motors introduced a slightly smaller as well as lighter weight auto that also looked less bulky than the previous models. But most significantly , GM introduced the famous small-scale block Chevy V8 , as well as engine that essentially is still inwards production today powering everything from Corvettes to Tahoes , to pickup trucks.
But yesteryear 1958 , the Chevrolet in i trial over again bloated to enormous proportions. While the 58 through sixty Chevys receive got their ain fans , they are solely dissimilar auto than the tri-five Chevys which receive got a smaller as well as lighter appearance.
But amidst these 3 models of the tri-five Chevys , in that location are meaning differences. While the 3 model years portion the same chassis as well as chief trunk components , the front end as well as parent styling of each model was largely different. The 1955 Chevrolet featured an egg-crate grill that was said to hold upward reminiscent of the Ferraris of the period. The auto had a sporty polish await , peculiarly alongside its truncated tail fins inwards the rear.
The '55 Chevy has a sports-car similar grill , reflecting the fascination alongside European sports cars inwards America at the time.
The 1956 model featured a total width grill which I believe was an endeavor to compete alongside Ford's pop Fairlane. The Ford Fairlane ads for the fourth dimension touted its "full-width grill" manifestly mocking Chevrolet's endeavor to emulate unusual makes. Perhaps it didn't aid that the '55 Chevy grills started to corrode rather chop-chop revealing the brass plating underneath the chrome which would plow light-green leading to the nickname "the light-green teeth Chevy's"
The '55 Ford Fairline featured a full-width grill.
In 1956 , Chevy followed suit. You either beloved it or abhor it. To me , it makes the auto await larger as well as heavier , but perchance that was the betoken , dorsum then.
While the 1956 models receive got their ain fans , I receive got to say I prefer the '55 await which appears to hold upward cleaner as well as less cluttered.
The '57 grill is a classic example of the jet-age jukebox overwrought styling of the menstruum , as well as also mimicked the Cadillacs of the fourth dimension - a pattern motif Chevrolet would revisit inwards the 1970's.
There were arguably 2 things going on alongside the 1957 grill. First , it was role of the "jet age" styling , designed to await similar the intake of a jet engine. It gives the auto a much heavier , "big car" await that mimicked the far to a greater extent than expensive Cadillac. With its "dagmar" bumperettes it was selling the masses a "Cadillac Jr." for far less money. John Delorean would accept a page from this playbook inwards the 1970's , putting a Cadillac grill on the full-sized Chevy of the era as well as watching sales soar - much to the chagrin of the managers of the to a greater extent than expensive brand.
Of course of pedagogy , it is the 1957 model that most people remember. With its starkly angular fins , broad side moldings , as well as jukebox-like grill , every bit good every bit the enormous amounts of chrome , the '57 has come upward to symbolize the excesses of the 1950's , fifty-fifty though the Virgil Exner "Forward look" Chryslers were arguably are a amend example of this. The '57 was withal a small-scale lightweight looking auto compared to the Chrysler products which appeared to hold upward bloated as well as huge.
As a small-scale fry , I would in all probability was to a greater extent than drawn to the 1957 every bit my favorite of the three. And I intend most people are drawn to that model because of its iconic status , peculiarly the pointy fins. However , the front end destination has a real heavy bloated chrome await to it which is a love/hate affair. I intend over fourth dimension every bit my tastes receive got matured , I receive got gravitated away from the 1957 as well as toward the cleaner , simpler await of the 1955 , which is less chrome-heavy.
My brother-in-law is a fan of the 1956 , but I don't come across it. It has also much of a "me too" await trying to ape the Fairlane. The oval egg-crate grill alongside the sculpted styling of the 1955 seems to hold upward all of i slice or i thought. The after "full width" grill of the 1956 seems tacked on , as well as the bloated whale-mouth of the 1957 as well as stiletto fins also seem "me too" to the Plymouth Fury - detracting from the cardinal subject of the design.
The 1955-1956 fins were understated as well as await similar role of the car.
The 1957 fins were , good , something else entirely. They receive got to a greater extent than of a tacked-on look.
Of course of pedagogy , it is the 1957 model that most people remember. With its starkly angular fins , broad side moldings , as well as jukebox-like grill , every bit good every bit the enormous amounts of chrome , the '57 has come upward to symbolize the excesses of the 1950's , fifty-fifty though the Virgil Exner "Forward look" Chryslers were arguably are a amend example of this. The '57 was withal a small-scale lightweight looking auto compared to the Chrysler products which appeared to hold upward bloated as well as huge.
This is what Chevrolet was trying to compete against - the 1957 Plymouth Fury , at to the lowest degree inwards the fin department. Ford largely stayed out of the fin fray.
As a small-scale fry , I would in all probability was to a greater extent than drawn to the 1957 every bit my favorite of the three. And I intend most people are drawn to that model because of its iconic status , peculiarly the pointy fins. However , the front end destination has a real heavy bloated chrome await to it which is a love/hate affair. I intend over fourth dimension every bit my tastes receive got matured , I receive got gravitated away from the 1957 as well as toward the cleaner , simpler await of the 1955 , which is less chrome-heavy.
The form of the trunk as well as grill of this 1952 Ferrari gives you lot an persuasion what the Chevrolet designers were getting at.
The '55 Chevy mimics this look. Early Thunderbirds also had this egg-crate grill.
My brother-in-law is a fan of the 1956 , but I don't come across it. It has also much of a "me too" await trying to ape the Fairlane. The oval egg-crate grill alongside the sculpted styling of the 1955 seems to hold upward all of i slice or i thought. The after "full width" grill of the 1956 seems tacked on , as well as the bloated whale-mouth of the 1957 as well as stiletto fins also seem "me too" to the Plymouth Fury - detracting from the cardinal subject of the design.
Well the Interiors of all 3 models were largely the same , the dashboards were indeed radically dissimilar , at to the lowest degree betwixt the 55-56 models as well as the 1957.
The 1955-1956 models featured a dual-cowl dash inwards the sports auto motif , but oddly plenty featuring American-style gauges.
The 1957 went to a to a greater extent than European await alongside circular gauges mounted inwards a dashboard binnacle.
It is strange , but the dash of the 1955-56 models seems similar it would hold upward to a greater extent than at abode inwards the baroque 1957 , spell the sporty circular gauges would jibe the sports auto subject of the 1955. The circular gauges would seem to hold upward to a greater extent than sporty , but gear upward inwards a body-colored bezel , the seem form of , good , out of place. So I intend the '55 wins hither every bit well.
Which tri-five Chevy are you? I intend which i you lot similar says something most you lot , too. If you lot are impulsive , immature , as well as similar loud , over-the-top styling , you lot volition instantly say , "the 1957" every bit it is the obvious alternative , beingness the most well-known as well as easiest to spot of the three. But if you lot are to a greater extent than contemplative as well as intend most the overall pattern subject as well as favor master copy designs , you lot powerfulness hold upward drawn to the 1955 as well as its sports-car look. If you lot are conservative as well as don't similar to construct waves , perchance the "full width" grill of the 1956 appeals to you lot - a to a greater extent than staid , larger-looking auto that blends inwards alongside the crowd.
One auto , 3 model years , three completely dissimilar cars , inwards damage of styling as well as the people who beloved them. Of course of pedagogy , if you lot beloved all 3 , I can't blame you. But what does that say most you lot every bit a person? Fickle is what! Or perchance schizophrenic.
EmoticonEmoticon